To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
So grabbing your phone back from a drunk violent girl is a crime?
Sill been praying that he's proven innocent.
Seems very easy to break up the accusers argument if majors is innocent.
1) phone records that indicate cheating or not
2) the defense brings the coat with the ripped buttons as evidence (don’t know how well this will hold but might make a chance to further prove majors story)
3) call the driver of the car to the stand and ask how the situation went down
4) social media picture of bruises or signs of using makeup to cover it)
These are the only things I can think of off the top of my head.
I don’t really follow law but if majors is innocent it seems very easy to prove it by first disproving where the accusers have said
Have you been following the trial? Jabari basically said he didn’t do anything and she was the attacker
This is a bias report Comic Book Nostalgia. You try to make yourself sound like you're neutral but there are clear biases what you choose to talk about. You don't talk about Johnathan's ex, Grace, going out clubbing after the alleged attack, or how there's video evidence that disproves her initial statements. Funny how everyone is already recasting kang but when Ezra Miller did his crap barely anyone wanted to recast him. Plus that Flash movie was crap. The story was horrible. Acting was good, though. You don't talk about the D.A. who want to continue the case , even though the Grace dropped all charges and even took back her statements. You don't talk about the many kids who were drugged in Hollywood.
Yeaaah, might wanna leave legal analysis to lawyers on the platform. This is quite a bad breakdown of the whole situation.
That does seem pretty fishy. Guy is becoming something huge, and a recently ex'd girlfriend claims this type of stuff. Idk, the way things have been unfolding these last few years, she's probably full of sh!t. Just trying to destroy a great out of spite and not gutting her moment in the sun
Jonathan Majors is innocent, that means he will continue to be Kang the Conqueror for Avengers The Knag Dynasty, which comes out on May 1, 2026 & Avengers Secret Wars, which comes out on May 7, 2027 also Marvel Studios, will Not, I repeat will Not recast Jonathan Majors, also Doctor Doom, will Not, I repeat will Not be apart of Avengers Secret Wars, It is Too Late!
U make coin from this? Amazing wot can be allowed today
Kang could have been or could be the great villain In MCU Jesus story
Dr doom 🤣 the dude should have been a light skin
Please don't fire him because of this and thats final